PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCL vs. FUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCL vs. FUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stepan Company (SCL) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCL achieves a 37.52% return, which is significantly higher than FUL's -5.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SCL has underperformed FUL with an annualized return of 1.56%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively higher 3.18% annualized return.


SCL

1D
-1.43%
1M
14.93%
6M
13.05%
YTD
37.52%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
-10.03%
5Y*
-9.65%
10Y*
1.56%
ALL TIME*
8.65%

FUL

1D
-0.14%
1M
-3.03%
6M
-6.87%
YTD
-5.87%
1Y
-0.01%
3Y*
-7.92%
5Y*
-1.81%
10Y*
3.18%
ALL TIME*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.21M$42.96M$45.53M
$10.89M$8.99M$7.98M

SCL vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCL
Stepan Company
37.52%-24.60%-30.29%-9.74%-12.91%5.24%17.75%39.96%-5.21%-2.06%
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
-5.87%-10.46%-16.19%14.97%-10.59%57.84%2.15%22.42%-19.84%12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SCL and FUL is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992

0.40

Over the past year, SCL and FUL have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SCL:

$1.46B

FUL:

$2.97B

EPS

SCL:

-$0.12

FUL:

$3.36

PS Ratio

SCL:

0.60

FUL:

0.87

PB Ratio

SCL:

1.21

FUL:

1.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

SCL:

$2.43B

FUL:

$3.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SCL:

$287.37M

FUL:

$1.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

SCL:

$84.96M

FUL:

$511.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCL vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCL
SCL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FUL
FUL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCL vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stepan Company (SCL) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCLFULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.03

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

-0.00

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.93

-0.00

+1.93

SCL vs. FUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the FUL Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCL and FUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCL vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCL drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FUL drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCL and FUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCLFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.78%

-68.25%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.78%

-26.97%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.02%

-43.45%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.48%

-43.45%

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.78%

-56.29%

-10.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.41%

-33.83%

-14.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.15%

-18.80%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.81%

9.52%

+6.29%

Volatility

SCL vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison

Stepan Company (SCL) has a higher volatility of 14.58% compared to H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) at 8.05%. This indicates that SCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCLFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.58%

8.05%

+6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.44%

27.24%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.47%

33.78%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.08%

29.76%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.87%

31.21%

+0.66%

Dividends

SCL vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison

SCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than FUL's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
1.74%1.56%1.29%0.99%1.03%0.82%1.25%1.23%1.44%1.10%1.14%1.40%
SCL
Stepan Company
2.45%3.27%2.33%1.55%1.63%1.01%0.95%1.00%1.25%1.06%0.95%1.47%

Financials

SCL vs. FUL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stepan Company and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SCL vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stepan Company and H.B. Fuller Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SCL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stepan Company reported a gross profit of 99.98M and revenue of 684.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.

FUL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 322.24M and revenue of 950.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

SCL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stepan Company reported an operating income of -28.23M and revenue of 684.11M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.

FUL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 122.83M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

SCL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stepan Company reported a net income of 22.91M and revenue of 684.11M, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

FUL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 67.81M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCL and FUL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCL has higher volatility (14.58%) compared to FUL (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCL dropped -66.78% vs FUL's -68.25%.

SCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCL and FUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer