PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCJ vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCJ vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 7.55%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


SCJ

1D
0.36%
1M
5.04%
YTD
14.35%
6M
16.37%
1Y
30.15%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
7.55%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCJ vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
14.35%29.58%3.41%13.22%-12.75%-2.95%7.46%16.16%-17.17%31.61%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SCJ and IVV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.58

The correlation between SCJ and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCJ vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCJ
IVV

Industrials

28.9%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
10.1%

Technology

11.2%
35.6%

Basic Materials

10.1%
1.8%

Financial Services

9.7%
11.8%

Real Estate

8.4%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.4%
8.5%

Communication Services

2.9%
11.2%

Utilities

2.1%
2.4%

Energy

0.8%
3.5%

Industrials

SCJ
28.9%
IVV
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCJ
14.6%
IVV
10.1%

Technology

SCJ
11.2%
IVV
35.6%

Basic Materials

SCJ
10.1%
IVV
1.8%

Financial Services

SCJ
9.7%
IVV
11.8%

Real Estate

SCJ
8.4%
IVV
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

SCJ
6.8%
IVV
4.9%

Healthcare

SCJ
4.4%
IVV
8.5%

Communication Services

SCJ
2.9%
IVV
11.2%

Utilities

SCJ
2.1%
IVV
2.4%

Energy

SCJ
0.8%
IVV
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCJ vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCJ
SCJ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCJ vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCJIVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

2.39

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

3.25

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.17

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.42

14.71

-6.29

SCJ vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCJ and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCJIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.39

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.83

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.86

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.45

-0.15

Drawdowns

SCJ vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCJIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.52%

-55.25%

+11.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-8.89%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

-18.75%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.25%

-24.53%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

-33.90%

-4.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-0.76%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-10.78%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

1.91%

+1.68%

Volatility

SCJ vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that SCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCJIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

2.87%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

8.90%

+4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

11.80%

+4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

16.88%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

18.05%

-1.76%

SCJ vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCJ vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
2.75%3.14%1.79%1.99%1.18%1.87%0.89%1.85%1.44%1.45%2.73%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCJ and IVV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCJ has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCJ dropped -43.52% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 7.55% for SCJ. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SCJ.

SCJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

SCJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCJ and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer