PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCIO vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCIO vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF (SCIO) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCIO achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 25.54% return.


SCIO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.92%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
-1.03%
1M
-12.93%
YTD
25.54%
6M
23.88%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCIO vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCIO and GSG is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCIO vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCIO
SCIO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SCIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCIO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCIO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCIO vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF (SCIO) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCIOGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

1.66

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.75

6.95

+3.80

SCIO vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCIO and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCIO vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCIO drawdown since its inception was -1.72%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCIO and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCIOGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-89.62%

+87.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-16.74%

+15.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-62.10%

+62.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-63.69%

+63.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

4.01%

-3.49%

Volatility

SCIO vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF (SCIO) is 0.75%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that SCIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCIOGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

5.46%

-4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

20.82%

-19.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

23.17%

-19.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.19%

22.67%

-19.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.19%

22.01%

-18.82%

SCIO vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCIO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCIO vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

SCIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCIO and GSG have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to SCIO (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCIO dropped -1.72% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 27.65% vs 5.43% for SCIO. On fees, SCIO is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, SCIO has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 27.65% return vs 5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCIO is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

SCIO has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

SCIO is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SCIO and 0.75% for GSG.

SCIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCIO and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer