SCINX vs. SSLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX).
SCINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jun 17, 1953. SSLCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 14, 2000.
Performance
SCINX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCINX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCINX DWS CROCI International Fund | 1.17% | 44.99% | 2.37% | 18.85% | -13.29% | 9.30% | 3.00% | 21.45% | -14.47% | 22.01% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 0.38% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCINX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SCINX has underperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.
SCINX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -10.46%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
SSLCX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 8.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCINX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCINX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCINX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
SCINX
SSLCX
SCINX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCINX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 0.50 | +1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 0.81 | +1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.11 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 0.62 | +1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 2.03 | +5.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCINX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 0.50 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.32 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.47 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.37 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCINX and SSLCX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SCINX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
SCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than SSLCX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCINX DWS CROCI International Fund | 2.72% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 3.55% | 3.48% | 3.89% | 1.80% | 3.39% | 3.73% | 2.49% | 3.76% | 3.52% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
Drawdowns
SCINX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCINX drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCINX and SSLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCINX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.90% | -63.14% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -10.06% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.06% | -22.57% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.59% | -48.07% | +12.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.91% | -5.55% | -5.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.95% | -11.38% | -5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.09% | +0.24% |
Volatility
SCINX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.67%. This indicates that SCINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCINX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.67% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 11.01% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.63% | 17.54% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 17.64% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 21.06% | -5.02% |