PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCINX vs. AAAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCINX vs. AAAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCINX achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly higher than AAAZX's 9.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SCINX has outperformed AAAZX with an annualized return of 9.92%, while AAAZX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.94% annualized return.


SCINX

1D
0.26%
1M
0.94%
6M
8.21%
YTD
10.33%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
9.92%

AAAZX

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.61%
6M
7.18%
YTD
9.15%
1Y
15.06%
3Y*
10.46%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCINX vs. AAAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCINX
DWS CROCI International Fund
10.33%44.99%2.37%18.85%-13.29%9.30%3.00%21.45%-14.47%22.01%
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
9.15%13.14%5.49%2.64%-9.57%23.83%3.91%21.79%-5.05%14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SCINX and AAAZX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2007

0.74

The correlation between SCINX and AAAZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCINX vs. AAAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCINX
SCINX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAZX
AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCINX vs. AAAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCINXAAAZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.29

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.63

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

7.45

+0.28

SCINX vs. AAAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the AAAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCINX and AAAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCINX vs. AAAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCINX drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, which is greater than AAAZX's maximum drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCINX and AAAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCINXAAAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.90%

-40.45%

-23.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-5.78%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-10.15%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.91%

-22.52%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.59%

-29.44%

-6.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-4.16%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.86%

-6.61%

-10.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

2.03%

+1.80%

Volatility

SCINX vs. AAAZX - Volatility Comparison

DWS CROCI International Fund (SCINX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) at 2.73%. This indicates that SCINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCINXAAAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.73%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

7.56%

+3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.96%

9.34%

+4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

12.10%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

12.69%

+3.08%

SCINX vs. AAAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCINX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCINX vs. AAAZX - Dividend Comparison

SCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than AAAZX's 6.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
6.72%4.15%2.85%2.40%4.50%2.62%1.60%2.07%1.89%1.79%1.82%2.53%
SCINX
DWS CROCI International Fund
2.49%2.75%3.20%3.55%3.48%3.89%1.80%3.39%3.73%2.49%3.76%3.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCINX and AAAZX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCINX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to AAAZX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCINX dropped -63.90% vs AAAZX's -40.45%.

SCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCINX and AAAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer