PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHO vs. VGIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHO vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than VGIT's -0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHO has outperformed VGIT with an annualized return of 1.68%, while VGIT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.14% annualized return.


SCHO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.62%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
1.68%

VGIT

1D
0.12%
1M
0.38%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
2.74%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
1.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHO vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.42%5.49%3.65%4.31%-3.87%-0.64%3.11%3.47%1.37%0.33%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
-0.39%7.34%1.39%4.28%-10.53%-2.64%7.71%6.19%1.35%1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHO and VGIT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010

0.76

The correlation between SCHO and VGIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHO vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VGIT
VGIT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VGIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHO vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHOVGITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.14

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

0.97

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

2.61

+11.98

SCHO vs. VGIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHO Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the VGIT Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHO and VGIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHO vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, smaller than the maximum VGIT drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and VGIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHOVGITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-16.05%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.86%

-2.83%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

-4.34%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.69%

-15.02%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.69%

-16.05%

+10.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-2.32%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-3.51%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

1.05%

-0.84%

Volatility

SCHO vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) is 0.49%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that SCHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHOVGITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

1.10%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.98%

2.47%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40%

3.38%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

5.39%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.56%

4.50%

-2.94%

SCHO vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHO and VGIT have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHO vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison

SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than VGIT's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.91%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
3.86%3.79%3.67%2.73%1.74%1.69%2.23%2.24%2.05%1.67%1.69%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHO and VGIT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGIT has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to SCHO (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHO dropped -5.69% vs VGIT's -16.05%.

On 10-year performance, SCHO leads with 1.68% vs 1.14% for VGIT. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHO has performed better with a 1.68% return vs 1.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHO and VGIT have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.86% for VGIT.

SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard.

SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHO and VGIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer