PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHO vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHO vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHO has underperformed UUP with an annualized return of 1.71%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.13% annualized return.


SCHO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
1.71%

UUP

1D
0.00%
1M
1.19%
YTD
3.40%
6M
3.41%
1Y
6.38%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHO vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.54%5.49%3.65%4.31%-3.87%-0.64%3.11%3.47%1.37%0.33%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.40%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHO and UUP is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010

-0.24

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SCHO and UUP has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.24 to -0.49, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHO vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHO vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHOUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.20

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

1.83

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.48

4.89

+11.59

SCHO vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHO and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHO vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHOUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-22.19%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.86%

-3.65%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

-10.05%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.69%

-10.37%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.69%

-14.24%

+8.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-3.17%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-8.91%

+8.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

1.36%

-1.16%

Volatility

SCHO vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) is 0.43%, while Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that SCHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHOUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

1.24%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.93%

4.23%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37%

6.07%

-4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.98%

7.22%

-5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.56%

6.96%

-5.40%

SCHO vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHO vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than UUP's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.90%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.32%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHO and UUP have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUP has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to SCHO (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHO dropped -5.69% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 10-year performance, UUP leads with 3.13% vs 1.71% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UUP has performed better with a 3.13% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.32% for UUP.

SCHO is categorized as Government Bonds, while UUP is Currency. SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHO and 0.75% for UUP.

SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHO and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer