PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHO vs. JPLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHO vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than JPLD's 1.25% return.


SCHO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
1.71%

JPLD

1D
0.06%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHO vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.58%5.49%3.65%2.95%
JPLD
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF
1.25%6.01%6.49%3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHO and JPLD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023

0.70

The correlation between SCHO and JPLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHO vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHO vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHOJPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.68

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

4.65

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.10

21.55

-4.45

SCHO vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHO Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHO and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHO vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and JPLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHOJPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-1.17%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.86%

-1.00%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-0.15%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.22%

-0.02%

Volatility

SCHO vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) has a higher volatility of 0.43% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.38%. This indicates that SCHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHOJPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

0.38%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.93%

0.97%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36%

1.44%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.98%

1.83%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.56%

1.83%

-0.27%

SCHO vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHO vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than JPLD's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPLD
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF
4.20%4.24%4.47%1.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.90%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHO and JPLD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHO has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to JPLD (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHO dropped -5.69% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

On 1-year performance, JPLD leads with 4.65% vs 3.47% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPLD has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 3.90% for SCHO.

SCHO is categorized as Government Bonds, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHO and 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHO and JPLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer