PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHLX vs. AAAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHLX vs. AAAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHLX achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly lower than AAAZX's 11.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHLX having a 7.47% annualized return and AAAZX not far ahead at 7.50%.


SCHLX

1D
3.12%
1M
3.30%
YTD
-4.95%
6M
-4.34%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
7.47%

AAAZX

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
11.09%
6M
11.68%
1Y
17.55%
3Y*
11.86%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
7.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHLX vs. AAAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHLX
DWS Health and Wellness Fund
-4.95%12.67%3.62%5.56%-7.22%15.43%15.40%22.40%3.50%19.37%
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
11.09%13.14%5.49%2.64%-9.57%23.83%3.91%21.79%-5.05%14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHLX and AAAZX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHLX and AAAZX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHLX vs. AAAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHLX
SCHLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SCHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAZX
AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHLX vs. AAAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHLXAAAZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

3.14

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

11.34

-9.43

SCHLX vs. AAAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the AAAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHLX and AAAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHLXAAAZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.97

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.43

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.40

+0.10

Drawdowns

SCHLX vs. AAAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHLX drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, which is greater than AAAZX's maximum drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHLX and AAAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHLXAAAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.46%

-40.45%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-5.68%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.73%

-10.15%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.62%

-22.52%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.47%

-29.44%

+1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-2.45%

-5.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-6.62%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

1.56%

+3.92%

Volatility

SCHLX vs. AAAZX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Health and Wellness Fund (SCHLX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) at 2.62%. This indicates that SCHLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHLXAAAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

2.62%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

7.30%

+3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

9.03%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

12.13%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

12.70%

+4.00%

SCHLX vs. AAAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHLX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHLX vs. AAAZX - Dividend Comparison

SCHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than AAAZX's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
3.73%4.15%2.85%2.40%4.50%2.62%1.60%2.07%1.89%1.79%1.82%2.53%
SCHLX
DWS Health and Wellness Fund
5.48%5.21%1.19%5.29%1.77%9.02%9.13%9.88%11.48%6.52%2.84%16.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHLX and AAAZX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHLX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to AAAZX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHLX dropped -45.46% vs AAAZX's -40.45%.

AAAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHLX and AAAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer