SCHL vs. FBIN
SCHL (Scholastic Corporation) and FBIN (Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.) are both stocks. SCHL operates in Publishing (Communication Services), while FBIN operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SCHL returned 1.98%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for FBIN. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SCHL vs. FBIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHL achieves a 38.66% return, which is significantly higher than FBIN's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHL has outperformed FBIN with an annualized return of 1.98%, while FBIN has yielded a comparatively lower 0.54% annualized return.
SCHL
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- -12.41%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- YTD
- 38.66%
- 1Y
- 67.10%
- 3Y*
- 0.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.35%
FBIN
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- -9.81%
- 3Y*
- -10.39%
- 5Y*
- -8.54%
- 10Y*
- 0.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $106.51M | $109.00M | $120.17M | |
| $19.27M | $15.77M | $14.66M |
SCHL vs. FBIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHL Scholastic Corporation | 38.66% | 43.96% | -42.00% | -2.52% | 0.48% | 62.97% | -33.43% | -3.00% | 1.86% | -14.30% |
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | -0.33% | -25.41% | -9.12% | 35.25% | -36.48% | 26.02% | 32.92% | 74.91% | -43.66% | 29.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHL and FBIN is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2011 | 0.37 |
The correlation between SCHL and FBIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SCHL:
$963.40M
FBIN:
$5.88B
SCHL:
$2.45
FBIN:
$2.44
SCHL:
16.59
FBIN:
20.21
SCHL:
0.64
FBIN:
1.17
SCHL:
$1.61B
FBIN:
$3.36B
SCHL:
$907.40M
FBIN:
$1.53B
SCHL:
$219.90M
FBIN:
$484.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHL vs. FBIN — Risk / Return Rank
SCHL
FBIN
SCHL vs. FBIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) and Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHL | FBIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.01 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.89 | -0.16 | +5.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.56 | -0.32 | +17.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHL vs. FBIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHL drawdown since its inception was -83.12%, which is greater than FBIN's maximum drawdown of -62.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHL and FBIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHL | FBIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.12% | -62.42% | -20.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.17% | -47.93% | +33.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.84% | -61.90% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.52% | -61.90% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.52% | -62.42% | -2.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.13% | -44.16% | +30.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -16.97% | -13.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 24.40% | -20.46% |
Volatility
SCHL vs. FBIN - Volatility Comparison
Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) and Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) have volatilities of 10.56% and 10.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHL | FBIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.56% | 10.50% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.35% | 39.56% | -15.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.88% | 47.00% | -11.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.57% | 37.73% | +3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 35.69% | +1.83% |
Dividends
SCHL vs. FBIN - Dividend Comparison
SCHL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than FBIN's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | 2.07% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 1.68% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.35% | 2.11% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.01% |
SCHL Scholastic Corporation | 1.97% | 2.70% | 3.75% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 1.50% | 2.40% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 1.50% | 1.26% | 1.56% |
Financials
SCHL vs. FBIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Scholastic Corporation and Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SCHL vs. FBIN - Profitability Comparison
SCHL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Scholastic Corporation reported a gross profit of 178.80M and revenue of 329.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.3%.
FBIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of -66.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SCHL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Scholastic Corporation reported an operating income of -26.90M and revenue of 329.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.2%.
FBIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported an operating income of -61.40M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.8%.
SCHL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Scholastic Corporation reported a net income of 62.50M and revenue of 329.10M, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.
FBIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a net income of -52.20M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHL and FBIN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHL has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to FBIN (10.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHL dropped -83.12% vs FBIN's -62.42%.
SCHL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHL and FBIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer