PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHL vs. AKAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCHL vs. AKAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) and Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHL achieves a 38.66% return, which is significantly higher than AKAM's 32.01% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHL has underperformed AKAM with an annualized return of 1.98%, while AKAM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.71% annualized return.


SCHL

1D
-2.84%
1M
-12.41%
6M
16.82%
YTD
38.66%
1Y
67.10%
3Y*
0.06%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
1.98%
ALL TIME*
4.35%

AKAM

1D
1.26%
1M
1.78%
6M
18.56%
YTD
32.01%
1Y
54.85%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
8.71%
ALL TIME*
-0.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$396.46M$419.56M$668.85M
$19.27M$15.77M$14.66M

SCHL vs. AKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHL
Scholastic Corporation
38.66%43.96%-42.00%-2.52%0.48%62.97%-33.43%-3.00%1.86%-14.30%
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
32.01%-8.78%-19.18%40.39%-27.97%11.48%21.54%41.42%-6.09%-2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHL and AKAM is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1999

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHL and AKAM has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SCHL:

$963.40M

AKAM:

$16.75B

EPS

SCHL:

$2.45

AKAM:

$2.94

PE Ratio

SCHL:

16.59

AKAM:

39.17

PS Ratio

SCHL:

0.64

AKAM:

4.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

SCHL:

$1.61B

AKAM:

$4.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SCHL:

$907.40M

AKAM:

$2.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

SCHL:

$219.90M

AKAM:

$1.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHL vs. AKAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHL
SCHL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SCHL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

AKAM
AKAM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHL vs. AKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) and Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHLAKAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.89

1.54

+3.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.56

4.31

+13.25

SCHL vs. AKAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHL Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the AKAM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHL and AKAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHL vs. AKAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHL drawdown since its inception was -83.12%, smaller than the maximum AKAM drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHL and AKAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHLAKAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.12%

-99.80%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.17%

-33.34%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.84%

-46.84%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.52%

-46.84%

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.52%

-46.84%

-17.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.13%

-64.84%

+50.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-82.50%

+51.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

11.86%

-7.92%

Volatility

SCHL vs. AKAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) is 10.56%, while Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that SCHL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHLAKAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.56%

16.05%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.35%

49.90%

-25.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.88%

57.09%

-21.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.57%

37.53%

+4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.52%

34.54%

+2.98%

Dividends

SCHL vs. AKAM - Dividend Comparison

SCHL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while AKAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHL
Scholastic Corporation
1.97%2.70%3.75%2.12%1.77%1.50%2.40%1.56%1.49%1.50%1.26%1.56%

Financials

SCHL vs. AKAM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Scholastic Corporation and Akamai Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SCHL vs. AKAM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Scholastic Corporation and Akamai Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SCHL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Scholastic Corporation reported a gross profit of 178.80M and revenue of 329.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.3%.

AKAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 602.31M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

SCHL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Scholastic Corporation reported an operating income of -26.90M and revenue of 329.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.2%.

AKAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.49M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

SCHL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Scholastic Corporation reported a net income of 62.50M and revenue of 329.10M, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.

AKAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 106.32M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCHL and AKAM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKAM has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to SCHL (10.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHL dropped -83.12% vs AKAM's -99.80%.

SCHL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHL and AKAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer