PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHK vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SCHK vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SCHK vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
-3.51%17.23%24.48%26.63%-19.51%26.17%25.02%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
2.74%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a -3.51% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 2.74% return.


SCHK

1D
0.73%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
-3.51%
6M
-1.54%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*

ALTL

1D
0.34%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
2.74%
6M
3.20%
1Y
27.97%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SCHK vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SCHK vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHK
SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHK vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHKALTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

1.51

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

2.06

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

2.85

-1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.17

9.84

-2.68

SCHK vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHK Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHK and ALTL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHKALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.51

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.18

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.62

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between SCHK and ALTL is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SCHK vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than ALTL's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
1.16%1.09%1.20%1.38%1.57%1.17%1.58%1.82%1.80%0.31%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
1.07%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SCHK vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than ALTL's maximum drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and ALTL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHKALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-31.91%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-9.79%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-31.91%

+6.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-5.11%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-11.84%

+6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.83%

-0.23%

Volatility

SCHK vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) at 3.01%. This indicates that SCHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SCHKALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

3.01%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

13.21%

-3.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

18.57%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.24%

18.21%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

20.10%

-0.87%