SCHD vs. IWS
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.91%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for IWS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
SCHD vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than IWS's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed IWS with an annualized return of 12.91%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
IWS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
SCHD vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 16.45% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and IWS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SCHD and IWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHD vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
IWS
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
IWS
Healthcare
SCHD
IWS
Technology
SCHD
IWS
Energy
SCHD
IWS
Financial Services
SCHD
IWS
Industrials
SCHD
IWS
Communication Services
SCHD
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
IWS
Basic Materials
SCHD
IWS
Utilities
SCHD
IWS
Real Estate
SCHD
-
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
IWS
SCHD vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHD | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.36 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 3.68 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 13.82 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -62.40% | +29.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -7.53% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -20.57% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -21.23% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -43.83% | +10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -8.01% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.00% | -0.11% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.05%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 4.29% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 9.97% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 13.53% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 17.36% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 19.37% | -2.65% |
SCHD vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHD vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than IWS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.32% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and IWS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWS has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 10.51% for IWS. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while IWS is Mid Cap Value Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.23% for IWS.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer