PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly higher than GDE's -1.30% return.


SCHD

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.61%
6M
15.19%
YTD
21.36%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
12.32%
ALL TIME*
13.25%

GDE

1D
-0.20%
1M
-4.95%
6M
-7.43%
YTD
-1.30%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
39.14%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
21.36%4.34%11.66%4.54%0.38%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
-1.30%73.76%44.79%33.85%-8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and GDE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and GDE has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHDGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.21

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.59

1.44

+4.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

3.38

+10.26

SCHD vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, roughly equal to the maximum GDE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-32.01%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-22.66%

+18.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-22.66%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-20.14%

+19.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-8.16%

+4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

9.62%

-7.73%

Volatility

SCHD vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.63%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

7.43%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

26.34%

-18.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

30.85%

-19.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

27.10%

-12.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

27.10%

-10.39%

SCHD vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHD vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than GDE's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
4.38%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.20%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and GDE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDE has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to SCHD (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 39.14% vs 13.54% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 39.14% return vs 13.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GDE.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 3.20% for SCHD.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.20% for GDE.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer