SCHB vs. IVV
SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHB returned 15.01%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for IVV. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHB vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 9.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHB having a 15.01% annualized return and IVV not far ahead at 15.47%.
SCHB
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
SCHB vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 9.68% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHB and IVV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SCHB and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHB vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHB
IVV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHB
IVV
Financial Services
SCHB
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHB
IVV
Communication Services
SCHB
IVV
Industrials
SCHB
IVV
Healthcare
SCHB
IVV
Consumer Defensive
SCHB
IVV
Energy
SCHB
IVV
Real Estate
SCHB
IVV
Utilities
SCHB
IVV
Basic Materials
SCHB
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHB vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHB
IVV
SCHB vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHB | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.76 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.44 | 12.43 | +0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHB vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHB | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -55.25% | +19.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -8.89% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -18.75% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -24.53% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.27% | -33.90% | -1.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -2.35% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -10.77% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.97% | +0.02% |
Volatility
SCHB vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.37%. This indicates that SCHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHB | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.37% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 9.59% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 12.28% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 16.95% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 18.08% | +0.27% |
SCHB vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHB and IVV have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHB vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than IVV's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SCHB and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHB has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.47% vs 15.01% for SCHB. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 15.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB and IVV have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.03% for SCHB.
SCHB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHB and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer