SCHB vs. FDVV
SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index while FDVV tracks the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHB returned 12.31%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for FDVV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
SCHB vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 7.59% return.
SCHB
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
FDVV
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 9.14% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 7.59% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHB and FDVV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SCHB and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHB vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHB
FDVV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SCHB
FDVV
Financial Services
SCHB
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHB
FDVV
Communication Services
SCHB
FDVV
Industrials
SCHB
FDVV
Healthcare
SCHB
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
SCHB
FDVV
Energy
SCHB
FDVV
-
Real Estate
SCHB
FDVV
Utilities
SCHB
FDVV
Basic Materials
SCHB
FDVV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHB vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHB
FDVV
SCHB vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHB | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.41 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.80 | 10.00 | +2.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHB | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.23 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.90 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.79 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
SCHB vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHB | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -40.25% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -9.30% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -15.90% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -20.18% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -1.85% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -3.80% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.24% | -0.29% |
Volatility
SCHB vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 2.96%. This indicates that SCHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHB | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 2.96% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 8.08% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 10.07% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 14.75% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 16.99% | +1.35% |
SCHB vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHB vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FDVV's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.74% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHB and FDVV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHB has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to FDVV (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.25% vs 12.31% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.
SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHB and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer