SCGVX vs. VMVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sands Capital Global Growth Fund (SCGVX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX).
SCGVX is managed by Sands Capital. It was launched on Mar 30, 2010. VMVFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
SCGVX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCGVX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCGVX Sands Capital Global Growth Fund | -17.59% | 10.68% | 15.64% | 31.49% | -43.49% | 9.56% | 49.33% | 29.89% | -2.97% | 38.38% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 1.71% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCGVX achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than VMVFX's 1.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCGVX having a 8.84% annualized return and VMVFX not far ahead at 9.02%.
SCGVX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- -17.59%
- 6M
- -18.61%
- 1Y
- -2.96%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- -2.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
VMVFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCGVX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCGVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCGVX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank
SCGVX
VMVFX
SCGVX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sands Capital Global Growth Fund (SCGVX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCGVX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | 0.90 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | 1.30 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 1.06 | -1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 5.20 | -6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCGVX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 0.90 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | 0.93 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.72 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.78 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCGVX and VMVFX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SCGVX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison
SCGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.51%, more than VMVFX's 9.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCGVX Sands Capital Global Growth Fund | 56.51% | 46.57% | 9.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 3.34% | 5.97% | 9.05% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.81% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
SCGVX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCGVX drawdown since its inception was -53.96%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCGVX and VMVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCGVX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.96% | -33.09% | -20.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.39% | -7.96% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.96% | -13.02% | -40.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.96% | -33.09% | -20.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.39% | -6.03% | -24.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.01% | -2.84% | -9.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.11% | 1.63% | +4.48% |
Volatility
SCGVX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison
Sands Capital Global Growth Fund (SCGVX) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.61%. This indicates that SCGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCGVX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 2.61% | +4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 4.87% | +8.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.71% | 10.02% | +11.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.54% | 10.75% | +14.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 12.48% | +10.36% |