PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCFIX vs. FFRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCFIX vs. FFRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) and Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCFIX achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than FFRCX's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCFIX has outperformed FFRCX with an annualized return of 4.38%, while FFRCX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.86% annualized return.


SCFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.92%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
4.38%

FFRCX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.72%
6M
2.27%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
3.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCFIX vs. FFRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCFIX
Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund
1.32%7.02%6.11%9.24%-2.52%5.08%3.36%7.61%0.85%3.54%
FFRCX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C
1.72%4.38%6.18%10.70%-2.34%4.08%0.61%7.49%-0.95%2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SCFIX and FFRCX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.41

The correlation between SCFIX and FFRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCFIX vs. FFRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCFIX
SCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRCX
FFRCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FFRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCFIX vs. FFRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) and Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCFIXFFRCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.36

2.41

+0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.51

5.17

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.83

1.81

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

4.30

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

26.30

14.97

+11.33

SCFIX vs. FFRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCFIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the FFRCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCFIX and FFRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCFIXFFRCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36

2.41

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.62

1.62

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.34

0.96

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.99

+0.34

Drawdowns

SCFIX vs. FFRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCFIX drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum FFRCX drawdown of -22.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCFIX and FFRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCFIXFFRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.08%

-22.31%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-1.33%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.72%

-3.37%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.30%

-6.30%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.08%

-22.31%

+9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-1.12%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.38%

-0.17%

Volatility

SCFIX vs. FFRCX - Volatility Comparison

Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) and Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) have volatilities of 0.50% and 0.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCFIXFFRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

0.51%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.29%

1.59%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63%

2.15%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.77%

2.70%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.28%

4.02%

-0.74%

SCFIX vs. FFRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCFIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRCX's 1.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCFIX vs. FFRCX - Dividend Comparison

SCFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, less than FFRCX's 6.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRCX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C
6.02%6.37%6.09%6.56%2.98%1.86%2.83%4.11%3.64%3.02%3.35%2.70%
SCFIX
Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund
5.33%5.54%5.85%5.21%3.86%4.93%3.24%3.78%3.87%3.09%3.07%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCFIX and FFRCX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFRCX has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to SCFIX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCFIX dropped -13.08% vs FFRCX's -22.31%.

SCFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCFIX and FFRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer