PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCETX vs. SAMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCETX vs. SAMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Equity Fund (SCETX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCETX achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly higher than SAMBX's 2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SCETX has outperformed SAMBX with an annualized return of 8.10%, while SAMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.


SCETX

1D
1.47%
1M
3.23%
YTD
17.12%
6M
15.50%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
8.10%

SAMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.69%
6M
3.96%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
4.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCETX vs. SAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCETX
Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Equity Fund
17.12%1.59%8.53%14.49%-9.79%27.43%0.92%17.62%-12.81%10.30%
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.69%5.88%7.03%11.21%-0.86%4.86%0.41%6.66%0.24%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SCETX and SAMBX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.21

The correlation between SCETX and SAMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCETX vs. SAMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCETX
SCETX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCETX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCETX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SAMBX
SAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCETX vs. SAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Equity Fund (SCETX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCETXSAMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.22

-0.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

9.56

-6.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

30.52

-20.96

SCETX vs. SAMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCETX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the SAMBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCETX and SAMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCETXSAMBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

3.06

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

1.89

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

1.19

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.20

-0.73

Drawdowns

SCETX vs. SAMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCETX drawdown since its inception was -55.69%, which is greater than SAMBX's maximum drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCETX and SAMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCETXSAMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.69%

-24.74%

-30.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

-0.78%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.66%

-2.95%

-28.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.66%

-5.66%

-26.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.64%

-20.91%

-27.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-1.58%

-8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

0.24%

+3.18%

Volatility

SCETX vs. SAMBX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Equity Fund (SCETX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) at 0.65%. This indicates that SCETX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCETXSAMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

0.65%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

1.79%

+10.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

2.44%

+15.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.95%

2.95%

+19.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

3.94%

+18.41%

SCETX vs. SAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCETX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SAMBX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCETX vs. SAMBX - Dividend Comparison

SCETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than SAMBX's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.42%7.78%8.21%8.21%5.34%3.03%4.03%5.28%5.15%4.28%4.79%4.91%
SCETX
Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Equity Fund
0.93%1.09%12.45%11.39%22.49%18.08%1.29%5.64%19.10%17.59%4.37%37.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCETX and SAMBX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCETX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to SAMBX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCETX dropped -55.69% vs SAMBX's -24.74%.

SAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCETX and SAMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer