SCEP vs. RFLR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SCEP (Sterling Capital Hedged Equity Premium Income ETF) and RFLR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCEP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RFLR.

Performance

SCEP vs. RFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Hedged Equity Premium Income ETF (SCEP) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCEP achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than RFLR's 12.46% return.

SCEP

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RFLR

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 4.80%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 10.27%
• 1Y: 28.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCEP vs. RFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCEP Sterling Capital Hedged Equity Premium Income ETF	2.41%	-0.50%
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	12.46%	-1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SCEP and RFLR is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

SCEP vs. RFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RFLR

RFLR Risk / Return Rank: 85
RFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
RFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCEP vs. RFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Hedged Equity Premium Income ETF (SCEP) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCEP	RFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.28	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.93	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.39	—

Drawdowns

SCEP vs. RFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCEP drawdown since its inception was -7.25%, smaller than the maximum RFLR drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCEP and RFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCEP	RFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.25%	-15.48%	+8.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	0.00%	-1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-3.73%	+2.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCEP	RFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.68%	12.54%	-1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.68%	12.27%	-1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.68%	12.27%	-1.59%

SCEP vs. RFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCEP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCEP vs. RFLR - Dividend Comparison

SCEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than RFLR's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	0.60%	0.67%	0.26%
SCEP Sterling Capital Hedged Equity Premium Income ETF	3.29%	0.38%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCEP and RFLR in my portfolio?

SCEP and RFLR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCEP or RFLR?

On fees, SCEP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCEP or RFLR?

SCEP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCEP or RFLR?

SCEP has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.60% for RFLR.

What is the main difference between SCEP and RFLR?

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SCEP and 0.89% for RFLR.