SCEP vs. QQHG
SCEP (Sterling Capital Hedged Equity Premium Income ETF) and QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCEP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQHG.
Performance
SCEP vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCEP achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 11.43% return.
SCEP
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 3.92%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQHG
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCEP vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCEP Sterling Capital Hedged Equity Premium Income ETF | 3.92% | -0.50% |
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 11.43% | -1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCEP and QQHG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCEP vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank
SCEP
QQHG
SCEP vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Hedged Equity Premium Income ETF (SCEP) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCEP | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 3.35 | -2.60 |
Drawdowns
SCEP vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCEP drawdown since its inception was -7.25%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCEP and QQHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCEP | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.25% | -6.18% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.26% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -0.97% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
SCEP vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCEP | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 9.47% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.87% | 9.53% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.87% | 9.53% | +0.34% |
SCEP vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCEP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCEP vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison
SCEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than QQHG's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 0.20% | 0.17% |
SCEP Sterling Capital Hedged Equity Premium Income ETF | 3.24% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCEP and QQHG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SCEP.
SCEP has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.
They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SCEP and 0.45% for QQHG.
Find the right allocation for SCEP and QQHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer