SCDV vs. COMB
SCDV (Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCDV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bahl & Gaynor, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCDV returned 14.53% vs 38.86% for COMB. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCDV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
SCDV vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCDV achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 26.81% return.
SCDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 14.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 25.89%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SCDV vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF | 10.50% | 3.09% | -6.38% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 26.81% | 15.12% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDV and COMB is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | 0.03 |
The correlation between SCDV and COMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDV vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
SCDV
COMB
SCDV vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCDV | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 5.08 | -3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | 13.24 | -9.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCDV | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.29 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.52 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
SCDV vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCDV drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDV and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDV | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -33.50% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.38% | -7.69% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -4.35% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -12.06% | +6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 2.94% | +0.77% |
Volatility
SCDV vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) have volatilities of 5.16% and 5.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDV | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 5.14% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 14.99% | -3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 17.02% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 16.70% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 15.13% | +4.06% |
SCDV vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCDV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCDV vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
SCDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than COMB's 7.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.14% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF | 0.52% | 0.61% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCDV and COMB have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCDV has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to COMB (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDV dropped -22.84% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 1-year performance, COMB leads with 38.86% vs 14.53% for SCDV. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMB has performed better with a 38.86% return vs 14.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SCDV.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 0.52% for SCDV.
SCDV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Bahl & Gaynor and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SCDV and 0.25% for COMB.
COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCDV and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer