SCDV vs. ASCE

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

SCDV (Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCDV returned 16.12% vs 37.81% for ASCE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCDV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

SCDV vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDV achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 27.62% return.

SCDV

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 3.31%
• 6M: 8.51%
• YTD: 15.19%
• 1Y: 16.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASCE

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -1.10%
• 6M: 21.34%
• YTD: 27.62%
• 1Y: 37.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDV vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	15.19%	1.40%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	27.62%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDV and ASCE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.77

The correlation between SCDV and ASCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCDV vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDV

SCDV Risk / Return Rank: 34
SCDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SCDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SCDV Omega Ratio Rank: 32
SCDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SCDV Martin Ratio Rank: 35

ASCE

ASCE Risk / Return Rank: 78
ASCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ASCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ASCE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ASCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ASCE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDV vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCDV	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.92	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	2.78	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.32	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	4.12	-2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.28	12.87	-8.59

SCDV vs. ASCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the ASCE Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDV and ASCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCDV vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDV drawdown since its inception was -23.14%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDV and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCDV	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.14%	-9.22%	-13.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.38%	-9.22%	-2.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-2.78%	+1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-2.03%	-3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	2.95%	+0.83%

Volatility

SCDV vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is 3.77%, while Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that SCDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCDV	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	6.35%	-2.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	14.94%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.85%	19.75%	-3.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.91%	19.66%	-0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.91%	19.66%	-0.75%

SCDV vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCDV vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

SCDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, more than ASCE's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.17%	0.22%	0.00%
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	0.41%	0.61%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCDV and ASCE in my portfolio?

SCDV and ASCE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCDV or ASCE?

ASCE has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to SCDV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDV dropped -23.14% vs ASCE's -9.22%.

Which ETF is better, SCDV or ASCE?

On 1-year performance, ASCE leads with 37.81% vs 16.12% for SCDV. On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, SCDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCDV or ASCE?

Over the 1-year period, ASCE has performed better with a 37.81% return vs 16.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCDV or ASCE?

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SCDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCDV or ASCE?

SCDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between SCDV and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: Bahl & Gaynor and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SCDV and 0.38% for ASCE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.