SCDS vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCDS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. SCDS is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, SCDS returned 46.17% vs 4.48% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. SCDS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

SCDS vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDS achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.35% return.

SCDS

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 6.33%
• YTD: 23.60%
• 6M: 24.35%
• 1Y: 46.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 4.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDS vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	23.60%	11.27%	7.26%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.35%	4.96%	2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDS and IBIC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024	-0.16

Return for Risk

SCDS vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDS

SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 79
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 85

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDS vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCDS	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	4.97	-2.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	8.97	-5.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	2.21	-0.78
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.25	17.05	-11.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.30	66.57	-48.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCDS vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCDS and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCDS	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	4.97	-2.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	3.49	-2.35

Drawdowns

SCDS vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDS drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDS and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCDS	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.71%	-0.90%	-25.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-0.26%	-8.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.15%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.29%	-0.10%	-5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	0.07%	+2.47%

Volatility

SCDS vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.34%. This indicates that SCDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCDS	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	0.34%	+5.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.97%	0.67%	+12.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.18%	0.90%	+17.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.22%	1.58%	+19.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.22%	1.58%	+19.64%

SCDS vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCDS vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	0.91%	1.15%	0.42%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCDS and IBIC in my portfolio?

SCDS and IBIC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCDS or IBIC?

SCDS has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to IBIC (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDS dropped -26.71% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, SCDS or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 46.17% vs 4.48% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCDS or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 46.17% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCDS or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCDS or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.91% for SCDS.

What is the main difference between SCDS and IBIC?

SCDS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCDS and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.97 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.