SCDS vs. ASCE

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCDS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

SCDS vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCDS achieves a 27.90% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 31.27% return.

SCDS

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 27.90%
• 6M: 24.54%
• 1Y: 48.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASCE

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: 8.80%
• YTD: 31.27%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCDS vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	27.90%	10.60%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	31.27%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SCDS and ASCE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

SCDS vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCDS

SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 85
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ASCE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCDS vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCDS	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.13	—	—

Drawdowns

SCDS vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCDS drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDS and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCDS	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.71%	-9.22%	-17.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-2.01%	-3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCDS	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	19.66%	-0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.26%	19.66%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.26%	19.66%	+1.60%

SCDS vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCDS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCDS vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than ASCE's 0.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.16%	0.22%	0.00%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	0.88%	1.15%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCDS and ASCE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SCDS and ASCE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SCDS or ASCE?

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCDS or ASCE?

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCDS or ASCE?

SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.16% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between SCDS and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCDS and 0.38% for ASCE.