SCCO vs. IRM
SCCO (Southern Copper Corporation) and IRM (Iron Mountain Incorporated) are both stocks. SCCO operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while IRM operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, SCCO returned 27.23%/yr vs 19.01%/yr for IRM. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCCO vs. IRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCCO achieves a 38.49% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 54.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SCCO has outperformed IRM with an annualized return of 27.23%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.01% annualized return.
SCCO
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- 38.49%
- 6M
- 38.12%
- 1Y
- 116.65%
- 3Y*
- 44.16%
- 5Y*
- 32.01%
- 10Y*
- 27.23%
IRM
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 54.53%
- 6M
- 55.48%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 34.90%
- 5Y*
- 27.60%
- 10Y*
- 19.01%
SCCO vs. IRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 38.49% | 66.62% | 9.45% | 50.12% | 4.25% | -0.62% | 58.79% | 46.59% | -33.11% | 50.79% |
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 54.53% | -18.24% | 54.48% | 46.52% | -0.08% | 87.74% | 0.98% | 5.87% | -7.97% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCCO and IRM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1996 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
SCCO:
$158.77B
IRM:
$37.74B
SCCO:
$6.04
IRM:
$0.91
SCCO:
32.01
IRM:
138.03
SCCO:
10.92
IRM:
5.19
SCCO:
$14.55B
IRM:
$7.25B
SCCO:
$6.04B
IRM:
$2.94B
SCCO:
$8.80B
IRM:
$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCCO vs. IRM — Risk / Return Rank
SCCO
IRM
SCCO vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCCO | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 1.18 | +2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.04 | 2.83 | +8.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCCO vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCCO drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCO and IRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCCO | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.60% | -55.71% | -22.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.22% | -25.15% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.69% | -39.03% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.07% | -39.03% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.83% | -39.03% | -15.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.36% | -3.72% | -6.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -13.16% | -8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.61% | 10.47% | +0.14% |
Volatility
SCCO vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) has a higher volatility of 20.20% compared to Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) at 7.80%. This indicates that SCCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCCO | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.20% | 7.80% | +12.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.61% | 24.00% | +17.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.75% | 32.05% | +17.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.94% | 29.69% | +10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.55% | 29.65% | +7.90% |
Dividends
SCCO vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison
SCCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than IRM's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 3.30% | 3.88% | 2.60% | 3.63% | 4.96% | 4.73% | 8.39% | 7.69% | 7.32% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% |
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 1.89% | 2.13% | 2.29% | 4.65% | 5.80% | 5.19% | 2.30% | 4.81% | 4.55% | 1.24% | 0.56% | 1.30% |
Financials
SCCO vs. IRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Southern Copper Corporation and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SCCO vs. IRM - Profitability Comparison
SCCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
IRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SCCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 2.48B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.3%.
IRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 395.23M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.
SCCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 37.1%.
IRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 143.67M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCCO and IRM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCCO has higher volatility (20.20%) compared to IRM (7.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCO dropped -78.60% vs IRM's -55.71%.
SCCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCCO and IRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer