SCCIX vs. NMKBX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCCIX (Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund) and NMKBX (North Square McKee Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, SCCIX returned 0.11%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for NMKBX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCCIX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for NMKBX.

Performance

SCCIX vs. NMKBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) and North Square McKee Bond Fund (NMKBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCIX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than NMKBX's 0.38% return.

SCCIX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.58%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 3.93%
• 5Y*: 0.11%
• 10Y*: 2.30%

NMKBX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 4.36%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCIX vs. NMKBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SCCIX Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund	0.50%	7.63%	1.45%	5.41%	-13.22%	-1.96%	0.18%
NMKBX North Square McKee Bond Fund	0.38%	7.26%	1.78%	5.96%	-9.46%	-1.24%	0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCIX and NMKBX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020	0.95

The correlation between SCCIX and NMKBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCCIX vs. NMKBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCIX

SCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
SCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

NMKBX

NMKBX Risk / Return Rank: 23
NMKBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NMKBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NMKBX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NMKBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
NMKBX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCIX vs. NMKBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) and North Square McKee Bond Fund (NMKBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCCIX	NMKBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.23	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.84	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.21	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	1.71	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.86	4.95	-0.09

SCCIX vs. NMKBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the NMKBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCIX and NMKBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCCIX vs. NMKBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCIX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, which is greater than NMKBX's maximum drawdown of -14.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCIX and NMKBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCCIX	NMKBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-14.25%	-7.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.04%	-2.69%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.40%	-6.84%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.25%	-14.25%	-4.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-1.45%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-4.50%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.93%	+0.11%

Volatility

SCCIX vs. NMKBX - Volatility Comparison

Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) and North Square McKee Bond Fund (NMKBX) have volatilities of 1.17% and 1.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCCIX	NMKBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.17%	1.18%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.04%	2.80%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07%	3.75%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.36%	5.44%	+0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.20%	5.23%	-0.03%

SCCIX vs. NMKBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than NMKBX's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCCIX vs. NMKBX - Dividend Comparison

SCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than NMKBX's 4.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NMKBX North Square McKee Bond Fund	4.19%	4.25%	4.19%	3.54%	2.12%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCCIX Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund	4.30%	4.34%	4.39%	3.82%	2.36%	1.13%	3.13%	4.39%	2.26%	1.75%	3.86%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCCIX and NMKBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, SCCIX and NMKBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCCIX or NMKBX?

NMKBX has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to SCCIX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCIX dropped -22.19% vs NMKBX's -14.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.