SCC vs. XDQQ
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SCC is passively managed, while XDQQ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCC returned -13.89%/yr vs 6.96%/yr for XDQQ. At a correlation of -0.78, they often move in opposite directions. SCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDQQ.
Performance
SCC vs. XDQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly higher than XDQQ's 0.38% return.
SCC
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- YTD
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- -10.09%
- 3Y*
- -19.74%
- 5Y*
- -13.89%
- 10Y*
- -24.49%
XDQQ
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SCC vs. XDQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 4.54% | -18.97% | -36.01% | -44.34% | 64.09% | -18.05% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 0.38% | 13.75% | 31.47% | 30.15% | -33.74% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and XDQQ is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021 | -0.78 |
The correlation between SCC and XDQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.78 (all time) to -0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. XDQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
XDQQ
SCC vs. XDQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCC | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.18 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 1.08 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 4.84 | -5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCC vs. XDQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than XDQQ's maximum drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and XDQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -35.63% | -64.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -11.84% | -13.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | -23.17% | -43.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | -35.63% | -41.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -2.54% | -97.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.01% | -10.63% | -75.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.44% | 2.63% | +13.81% |
Volatility
SCC vs. XDQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) has a higher volatility of 12.93% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) at 4.00%. This indicates that SCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.93% | 4.00% | +8.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.47% | 10.67% | +17.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.42% | 14.27% | +23.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.33% | 19.87% | +24.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.48% | 19.53% | +19.95% |
SCC vs. XDQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDQQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCC vs. XDQQ - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.44% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and XDQQ have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCC has higher volatility (12.93%) compared to XDQQ (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCC dropped -99.92% vs XDQQ's -35.63%.
On 5-year performance, XDQQ leads with 6.96% vs -13.89% for SCC. On fees, XDQQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XDQQ has performed better with a 6.96% return vs -13.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDQQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCC.
SCC has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCC and 0.79% for XDQQ.
XDQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCC and XDQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer