SCC vs. XDQQ
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SCC is passively managed, while XDQQ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCC returned -14.17%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for XDQQ. At a correlation of -0.79, they often move in opposite directions. SCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDQQ.
Performance
SCC vs. XDQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly higher than XDQQ's 2.83% return.
SCC
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- -12.48%
- 3Y*
- -21.64%
- 5Y*
- -14.17%
- 10Y*
- -24.95%
XDQQ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 16.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- —
SCC vs. XDQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 8.21% | -18.97% | -36.01% | -44.34% | 64.09% | -18.05% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 2.83% | 13.75% | 31.47% | 30.15% | -33.74% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and XDQQ is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021 | -0.79 |
The correlation between SCC and XDQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.79 (all time) to -0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. XDQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
XDQQ
SCC vs. XDQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCC | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.25 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 1.42 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 6.45 | -7.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCC vs. XDQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than XDQQ's maximum drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and XDQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -35.63% | -64.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.45% | -11.84% | -14.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | -23.17% | -43.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | -35.63% | -41.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -0.06% | -99.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.97% | -10.72% | -75.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.30% | 2.60% | +14.70% |
Volatility
SCC vs. XDQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) has a higher volatility of 12.97% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) at 0.64%. This indicates that SCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.97% | 0.64% | +12.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.84% | 10.31% | +17.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.09% | 13.80% | +23.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.20% | 19.80% | +24.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 19.55% | +20.12% |
SCC vs. XDQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDQQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCC vs. XDQQ - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, while XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 4.35% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and XDQQ have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCC has higher volatility (12.97%) compared to XDQQ (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCC dropped -99.92% vs XDQQ's -35.63%.
On 5-year performance, XDQQ leads with 7.88% vs -14.17% for SCC. On fees, XDQQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XDQQ has performed better with a 7.88% return vs -14.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDQQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCC.
SCC has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCC and 0.79% for XDQQ.
XDQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCC and XDQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer