PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCBFY vs. TSCFY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCBFY vs. TSCFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Standard Chartered PLC (SCBFY) and TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR (TSCFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCBFY achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly higher than TSCFY's 6.14% return.


SCBFY

1D
-3.52%
1M
7.19%
YTD
12.99%
6M
24.66%
1Y
81.93%
3Y*
52.69%
5Y*
34.49%
10Y*

TSCFY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6.14%
6M
6.14%
1Y
8.34%
3Y*
12.61%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCBFY vs. TSCFY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCBFY
Standard Chartered PLC
12.99%103.24%52.51%15.76%23.36%-2.07%-31.49%22.37%
TSCFY
TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR
6.14%26.78%3.89%21.46%-7.61%14.98%-11.36%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SCBFY and TSCFY is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2019

0.00

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SCBFY:

$62.91B

TSCFY:

$2.44B

EPS

SCBFY:

$4.55

TSCFY:

$153.88

PE Ratio

SCBFY:

11.99

TSCFY:

0.20

PEG Ratio

SCBFY:

0.35

TSCFY:

0.00

PS Ratio

SCBFY:

1.83

TSCFY:

0.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

SCBFY:

$35.24B

TSCFY:

$24.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SCBFY:

$21.49B

TSCFY:

$18.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

SCBFY:

$7.89B

TSCFY:

$8.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCBFY vs. TSCFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCBFY
SCBFY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SCBFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCBFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCBFY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SCBFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCBFY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

TSCFY
TSCFY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TSCFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCFY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCFY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCBFY vs. TSCFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Standard Chartered PLC (SCBFY) and TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR (TSCFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCBFYTSCFYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

0.43

+2.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

0.78

+2.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.18

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

1.78

+1.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.68

10.39

+2.30

SCBFY vs. TSCFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCBFY Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the TSCFY Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCBFY and TSCFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCBFYTSCFYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

0.43

+2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.35

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.52

+0.08

Drawdowns

SCBFY vs. TSCFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCBFY drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, which is greater than TSCFY's maximum drawdown of -34.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCBFY and TSCFY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCBFYTSCFYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.18%

-34.84%

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.98%

-4.77%

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

-13.65%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

-13.96%

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

0.00%

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-8.59%

-9.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.48%

0.81%

+5.67%

Volatility

SCBFY vs. TSCFY - Volatility Comparison

Standard Chartered PLC (SCBFY) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR (TSCFY) at 0.00%. This indicates that SCBFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSCFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCBFYTSCFYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.44%

0.00%

+11.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.26%

13.42%

+12.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

19.75%

+12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.06%

23.57%

+12.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.30%

45.85%

-5.55%

Dividends

SCBFY vs. TSCFY - Dividend Comparison

SCBFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than TSCFY's 7.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SCBFY
Standard Chartered PLC
2.25%1.63%2.40%2.36%1.66%1.96%2.75%
TSCFY
TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR
7.81%7.59%8.41%10.36%8.63%7.21%7.92%

Financials

SCBFY vs. TSCFY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Standard Chartered PLC and TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
10.16B
6.49B
(SCBFY) Total Revenue
(TSCFY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SCBFY vs. TSCFY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Standard Chartered PLC and TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
58.1%
71.7%
Portfolio components
SCBFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Standard Chartered PLC reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 10.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.

TSCFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR reported a gross profit of 4.66B and revenue of 6.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

SCBFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Standard Chartered PLC reported an operating income of 2.45B and revenue of 10.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.

TSCFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR reported an operating income of 2.23B and revenue of 6.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.

SCBFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Standard Chartered PLC reported a net income of 1.90B and revenue of 10.16B, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.

TSCFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 6.49B, resulting in a net margin of 27.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCBFY and TSCFY have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCBFY has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to TSCFY (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCBFY dropped -55.18% vs TSCFY's -34.84%.

SCBFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCBFY and TSCFY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer