PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCATX vs. AMRGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCATX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCATX achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's 18.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SCATX has outperformed AMRGX with an annualized return of 17.53%, while AMRGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.23% annualized return.


SCATX

1D
-0.34%
1M
9.53%
YTD
6.19%
6M
3.98%
1Y
9.18%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
17.53%

AMRGX

1D
1.75%
1M
7.84%
YTD
18.37%
6M
16.83%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCATX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCATX
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund
6.19%10.22%35.81%65.58%-55.30%-9.93%119.67%37.02%10.84%34.23%
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
18.37%11.18%16.61%24.38%-19.93%15.64%18.65%36.73%-9.07%13.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SCATX and AMRGX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between SCATX and AMRGX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCATX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCATX
SCATX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SCATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCATX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SCATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCATX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AMRGX
AMRGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AMRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AMRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCATX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCATXAMRGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

1.47

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

2.23

-1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.39

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

2.83

-2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.94

6.90

-5.96

SCATX vs. AMRGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCATX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the AMRGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCATX and AMRGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCATXAMRGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

1.47

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.48

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.12

+0.31

Drawdowns

SCATX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCATX drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, smaller than the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCATX and AMRGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCATXAMRGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.92%

-80.32%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.17%

-13.98%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.26%

-21.15%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

-35.42%

-28.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.92%

-35.42%

-31.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.79%

0.00%

-9.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.86%

-40.25%

+24.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.04%

5.66%

+4.38%

Volatility

SCATX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) is 5.82%, while American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that SCATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCATXAMRGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

6.47%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.84%

24.98%

-7.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

26.89%

-3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.00%

22.21%

+13.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.65%

21.50%

+11.15%

SCATX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCATX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCATX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison

SCATX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
15.06%17.82%12.39%8.17%7.77%12.21%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCATX
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.18%10.09%18.59%7.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCATX and AMRGX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMRGX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to SCATX (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCATX dropped -66.92% vs AMRGX's -80.32%.

AMRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCATX and AMRGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer