PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCAP vs. EPSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCAP vs. EPSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCAP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than EPSV's 27.95% return.


SCAP

1D
-1.65%
1M
3.11%
YTD
11.10%
6M
9.71%
1Y
26.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EPSV

1D
-0.87%
1M
4.61%
YTD
27.95%
6M
25.89%
1Y
45.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCAP vs. EPSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SCAP
Infracap Small Cap Income ETF
11.10%22.16%
EPSV
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
27.95%22.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SCAP and EPSV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.85

The correlation between SCAP and EPSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCAP vs. EPSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCAP
EPSV

Industrials

21.5%
23.2%

Financial Services

17.1%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

14.5%
8.3%

Technology

12.8%
16.1%

Real Estate

9.8%
8.3%

Basic Materials

8.2%
5.2%

Energy

4.3%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Healthcare

2.8%
2.4%

Utilities

2.4%
1.5%

Industrials

SCAP
21.5%
EPSV
23.2%

Financial Services

SCAP
17.1%
EPSV
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SCAP
14.5%
EPSV
8.3%

Technology

SCAP
12.8%
EPSV
16.1%

Real Estate

SCAP
9.8%
EPSV
8.3%

Basic Materials

SCAP
8.2%
EPSV
5.2%

Energy

SCAP
4.3%
EPSV
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

SCAP
3.7%
EPSV
3.7%

Communication Services

SCAP
2.9%
EPSV

-

Healthcare

SCAP
2.8%
EPSV
2.4%

Utilities

SCAP
2.4%
EPSV
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCAP vs. EPSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCAP
SCAP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

EPSV
EPSV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCAP vs. EPSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCAPEPSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

5.06

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

17.56

-10.02

SCAP vs. EPSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the EPSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCAP and EPSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCAP vs. EPSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCAP drawdown since its inception was -24.13%, which is greater than EPSV's maximum drawdown of -8.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCAP and EPSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCAPEPSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.13%

-8.93%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-8.93%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-0.87%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-1.63%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.57%

+0.91%

Volatility

SCAP vs. EPSV - Volatility Comparison

Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) at 5.60%. This indicates that SCAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCAPEPSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

5.60%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

13.18%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.57%

18.09%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

18.24%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

18.24%

+0.54%

SCAP vs. EPSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCAP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than EPSV's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCAP vs. EPSV - Dividend Comparison

SCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than EPSV's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EPSV
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
2.25%2.88%0.00%0.00%
SCAP
Infracap Small Cap Income ETF
6.88%6.71%6.89%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCAP and EPSV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCAP has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to EPSV (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCAP dropped -24.13% vs EPSV's -8.93%.

On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 45.03% vs 26.20% for SCAP. On fees, SCAP is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, EPSV has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 45.03% return vs 26.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCAP is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSV.

SCAP has the higher dividend yield at 6.88%, compared with 2.25% for EPSV.

They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SCAP and 0.88% for EPSV.

EPSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCAP and EPSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer