SCA vs. SPIN
SCA (GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF) and SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPIN.
Performance
SCA vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCA
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -19.12%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIN
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 14.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCA vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | -15.79% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCA and SPIN is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCA vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank
SCA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPIN
SCA vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCA vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCA drawdown since its inception was -20.09%, which is greater than SPIN's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCA and SPIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -16.85% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.09% | -0.53% | -19.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -2.27% | -7.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.42% | — |
Volatility
SCA vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.51% | 11.18% | +38.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.51% | 14.35% | +35.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.51% | 14.35% | +35.16% |
SCA vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCA vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison
SCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than SPIN's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF | 8.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.17% | 8.20% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCA and SPIN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SCA.
SCA has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 5.17% for SPIN.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SCA and 0.25% for SPIN.
Find the right allocation for SCA and SPIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer