SCA vs. FINY

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

SCA (GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF) and FINY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.07% expense ratio.

Performance

SCA vs. FINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF (FINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCA

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -19.12%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FINY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 3.31%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCA vs. FINY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF	-15.79%
FINY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF	3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SCA and FINY is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	-0.19

Return for Risk

SCA vs. FINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF (SCA) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF (FINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

SCA vs. FINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCA drawdown since its inception was -20.09%, which is greater than FINY's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCA and FINY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCA	FINY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.09%	-0.63%	-19.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.09%	0.00%	-20.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-0.06%	-9.42%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCA	FINY	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.51%	4.45%	+45.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.51%	4.45%	+45.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.51%	4.45%	+45.06%

SCA vs. FINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCA and FINY have an expense ratio of 1.07%.

Dividends

SCA vs. FINY - Dividend Comparison

SCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than FINY's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM
FINY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF	4.38%
SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF	8.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCA and FINY in my portfolio?

SCA and FINY have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCA or FINY?

Both ETFs have the same 1.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCA or FINY?

SCA and FINY have the same expense ratio: 1.07% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCA or FINY?

SCA has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 4.38% for FINY.