PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Z.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0Z.DE achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.DE's 20.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0Z.DE has underperformed EQQQ.DE with an annualized return of 9.78%, while EQQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.28% annualized return.


SC0Z.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
12.95%
6M
14.97%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
9.78%

EQQQ.DE

1D
-0.85%
1M
7.99%
YTD
20.52%
6M
18.72%
1Y
37.03%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
21.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0Z.DE
Invesco European Utilities Sector UCITS ETF
12.95%32.73%0.20%13.45%-9.07%8.96%9.52%29.64%0.81%8.10%
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
20.52%6.94%33.67%51.32%-30.10%39.43%34.58%42.87%3.12%15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0Z.DE and EQQQ.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2009

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between SC0Z.DE and EQQQ.DE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0Z.DE
SC0Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SC0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.DE
EQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Z.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0Z.DEEQQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

3.74

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

11.10

-1.68

SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0Z.DE and EQQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0Z.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.40

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.93

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

1.08

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.80

-0.43

Drawdowns

SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.41%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0Z.DE and EQQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0Z.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.41%

-47.04%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-10.05%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.65%

-26.70%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-31.30%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

-31.30%

-2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.34%

-0.85%

-4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-7.35%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.39%

-0.62%

Volatility

SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Z.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) at 4.26%. This indicates that SC0Z.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0Z.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

4.26%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

10.90%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

15.64%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

19.84%

-3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

19.65%

-2.52%

SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0Z.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SC0Z.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

SC0Z.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.37%0.39%0.57%0.25%0.41%0.54%0.64%0.68%0.78%0.73%
SC0Z.DE
Invesco European Utilities Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0Z.DE and EQQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0Z.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.

SC0Z.DE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while EQQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. SC0Z.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Utilities, while EQQQ.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0Z.DE and 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0Z.DE and EQQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer