PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF (SC0V.DE) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0V.DE achieves a 34.01% return, which is significantly lower than RENW.DE's 43.00% return.


SC0V.DE

1D
-0.63%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
34.01%
6M
32.79%
1Y
58.80%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
19.52%
10Y*
11.36%

RENW.DE

1D
-1.77%
1M
4.00%
YTD
43.00%
6M
41.28%
1Y
80.41%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SC0V.DE
Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF
34.01%29.15%-5.65%5.37%30.86%20.64%13.86%
RENW.DE
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF
43.00%35.27%-9.64%-11.30%-3.32%1.09%18.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0V.DE and RENW.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.44

The correlation between SC0V.DE and RENW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0V.DE
SC0V.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SC0V.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0V.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0V.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0V.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0V.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

RENW.DE
RENW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF (SC0V.DE) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0V.DERENW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.56

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.93

9.22

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.20

34.50

-6.30

SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0V.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0V.DE and RENW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0V.DERENW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

3.49

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.41

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.49

-0.15

Drawdowns

SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0V.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.15%, which is greater than RENW.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0V.DE and RENW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0V.DERENW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.15%

-43.93%

-13.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-8.63%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-35.00%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.22%

-42.30%

+20.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-3.64%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-17.33%

+6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.31%

-0.24%

Volatility

SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco European Oil & Gas Sector UCITS ETF (SC0V.DE) is 6.07%, while L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that SC0V.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RENW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0V.DERENW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

8.24%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

16.85%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

22.80%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.74%

22.02%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.93%

22.48%

+1.45%

SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0V.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RENW.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SC0V.DE vs. RENW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0V.DE nor RENW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0V.DE and RENW.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0V.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0V.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RENW.DE.

SC0V.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Oil & Gas, while RENW.DE tracks Solactive Clean Energy. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0V.DE and 0.49% for RENW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0V.DE and RENW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer