PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Autos Sector UCITS ETF (SC0P.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0P.DE achieves a -11.55% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.DE's 20.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0P.DE has underperformed EQQQ.DE with an annualized return of 2.37%, while EQQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.28% annualized return.


SC0P.DE

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.76%
YTD
-11.55%
6M
-13.18%
1Y
-8.72%
3Y*
-6.25%
5Y*
-4.61%
10Y*
2.37%

EQQQ.DE

1D
-0.85%
1M
9.27%
YTD
20.52%
6M
19.39%
1Y
37.72%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
21.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0P.DE
Invesco European Autos Sector UCITS ETF
-11.55%2.03%-10.79%24.20%-16.71%23.96%4.85%19.08%-26.00%16.92%
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
20.52%6.94%33.67%51.32%-30.10%39.43%34.58%42.87%3.12%15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0P.DE and EQQQ.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2009

0.46

The correlation between SC0P.DE and EQQQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0P.DE
SC0P.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SC0P.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0P.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0P.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0P.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0P.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.DE
EQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Autos Sector UCITS ETF (SC0P.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0P.DEEQQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.42

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

3.74

-4.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

11.10

-12.07

SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0P.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0P.DE and EQQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0P.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

2.40

-2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.93

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

1.08

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.80

-0.55

Drawdowns

SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0P.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.05%, which is greater than EQQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0P.DE and EQQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0P.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.05%

-47.04%

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.74%

-10.05%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.82%

-26.70%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.82%

-31.30%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.05%

-31.30%

-28.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.84%

-0.85%

-29.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-7.35%

-8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.99%

3.39%

+5.60%

Volatility

SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Autos Sector UCITS ETF (SC0P.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) at 4.26%. This indicates that SC0P.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0P.DEEQQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

4.26%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.30%

10.90%

+6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

15.64%

+7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.57%

19.84%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.09%

19.65%

+6.44%

SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0P.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SC0P.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

SC0P.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.DE
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.37%0.39%0.57%0.25%0.41%0.54%0.64%0.68%0.78%0.73%
SC0P.DE
Invesco European Autos Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0P.DE and EQQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0P.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0P.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.

SC0P.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while EQQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. SC0P.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Automobiles & Parts, while EQQQ.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0P.DE and 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0P.DE and EQQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer