PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (SC0I.DE) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SC0I.DE having a 14.80% return and ETLR.DE slightly lower at 14.72%.


SC0I.DE

1D
-2.54%
1M
-4.40%
6M
7.55%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
8.52%

ETLR.DE

1D
-2.08%
1M
-3.05%
6M
7.91%
YTD
14.72%
1Y
31.18%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SC0I.DE
Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
14.80%12.31%13.65%16.36%-12.51%9.85%5.13%18.13%
ETLR.DE
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF
14.72%12.41%14.84%16.04%-12.03%10.00%5.42%16.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0I.DE and ETLR.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019

0.98

The correlation between SC0I.DE and ETLR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0I.DE
SC0I.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SC0I.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0I.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0I.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0I.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0I.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ETLR.DE
ETLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ETLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (SC0I.DE) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SC0I.DEETLR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

2.98

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.87

9.70

+0.18

SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0I.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the ETLR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0I.DE and ETLR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0I.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than ETLR.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0I.DE and ETLR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0I.DEETLR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-27.65%

-14.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-10.42%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-16.41%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.11%

-18.74%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-5.52%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-5.40%

-8.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.21%

+0.02%

Volatility

SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (SC0I.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE) at 6.15%. This indicates that SC0I.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0I.DEETLR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

6.15%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.47%

15.62%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.87%

19.21%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.51%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

16.94%

+0.41%

SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0I.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLR.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0I.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0I.DE nor ETLR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SC0I.DE and ETLR.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ETLR.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SC0I.DE.

SC0I.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while ETLR.DE tracks Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SC0I.DE and 0.10% for ETLR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0I.DE and ETLR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer