PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (SC0I.DE) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0I.DE achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than SMLD.DE's 24.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0I.DE has outperformed SMLD.DE with an annualized return of 8.52%, while SMLD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.39% annualized return.


SC0I.DE

1D
-2.54%
1M
-4.40%
6M
7.55%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
8.52%

SMLD.DE

1D
0.45%
1M
7.83%
6M
16.72%
YTD
24.99%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
19.56%
10Y*
6.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0I.DE
Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
14.80%12.31%13.65%16.36%-12.51%9.85%5.13%22.22%-9.86%9.04%
SMLD.DE
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist
24.99%-8.84%28.79%15.50%39.45%46.81%-37.59%12.61%-11.81%-19.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0I.DE and SMLD.DE is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2013

0.33

The correlation between SC0I.DE and SMLD.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0I.DE
SC0I.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SC0I.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0I.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0I.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0I.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0I.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLD.DE
SMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (SC0I.DE) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SC0I.DESMLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

2.15

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.87

4.71

+5.16

SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0I.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the SMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0I.DE and SMLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0I.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum SMLD.DE drawdown of -83.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0I.DE and SMLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0I.DESMLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-83.65%

+41.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-9.68%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-22.99%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.11%

-22.99%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.00%

-76.32%

+48.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-0.07%

-7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-33.91%

+20.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

4.42%

-1.19%

Volatility

SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (SC0I.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE) at 3.70%. This indicates that SC0I.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0I.DESMLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

3.70%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.47%

12.95%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.87%

16.61%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

20.27%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

29.07%

-11.72%

SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0I.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SMLD.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SC0I.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

SC0I.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMLD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SC0I.DE
Invesco MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLD.DE
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist
7.43%8.45%7.99%8.81%8.09%8.24%11.54%9.90%9.70%8.60%7.76%9.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0I.DE and SMLD.DE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0I.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0I.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SMLD.DE.

SC0I.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while SMLD.DE is Energy Equities. SC0I.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while SMLD.DE tracks Morningstar MLP Composite. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SC0I.DE and 0.50% for SMLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0I.DE and SMLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer