PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SC0C.DE is traded in EUR, while TPXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TPXG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0C.DE achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than TPXG.L's 15.97% return.


SC0C.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
3.10%
YTD
7.46%
6M
10.04%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
9.07%

TPXG.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.40%
YTD
15.97%
6M
15.74%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0C.DE
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
7.46%20.66%8.31%15.54%-10.52%24.51%-1.98%28.32%-11.21%4.66%
TPXG.L
Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY
15.97%12.41%13.08%15.86%-11.01%9.88%1.41%13.38%-3.16%10.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0C.DE and TPXG.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017

0.26

Over the past year, SC0C.DE and TPXG.L have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0C.DE
SC0C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SC0C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

TPXG.L
TPXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0C.DETPXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.93

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

9.67

-3.13

SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0C.DE and TPXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0C.DETPXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.62

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.92

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.89

-0.28

Drawdowns

SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0C.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.89%, which is greater than TPXG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0C.DE and TPXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0C.DETPXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.89%

-27.51%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-9.70%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-15.91%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-18.47%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-0.28%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-4.91%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.95%

-0.46%

Volatility

SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) at 3.64%. This indicates that SC0C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0C.DETPXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

3.64%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

14.19%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

17.59%

-4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

20.96%

-6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

25.96%

-9.97%

SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0C.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than TPXG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0C.DE vs. TPXG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0C.DE nor TPXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0C.DE and TPXG.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0C.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0C.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TPXG.L.

SC0C.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while TPXG.L is Japan Equities. SC0C.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600, while TPXG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SC0C.DE and 0.20% for TPXG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0C.DE and TPXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer