PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0C.DE achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly higher than AMES.DE's 7.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SC0C.DE has underperformed AMES.DE with an annualized return of 9.07%, while AMES.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.05% annualized return.


SC0C.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
3.10%
YTD
7.46%
6M
10.04%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
9.07%

AMES.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
3.60%
YTD
7.00%
6M
10.82%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC0C.DE
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
7.46%20.66%8.31%15.54%-10.52%24.51%-1.98%28.32%-11.21%10.84%
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
7.00%55.41%19.00%25.94%0.03%6.96%-12.87%15.76%-12.77%11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0C.DE and AMES.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011

0.68

The correlation between SC0C.DE and AMES.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (10 years) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0C.DE
SC0C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SC0C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0C.DEAMES.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.40

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

11.80

-5.25

SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0C.DE and AMES.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0C.DEAMES.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.06

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.20

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.62

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.48

+0.13

Drawdowns

SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0C.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.89%, smaller than the maximum AMES.DE drawdown of -40.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0C.DE and AMES.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0C.DEAMES.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.89%

-40.98%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-9.95%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-12.58%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-17.77%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.89%

-40.98%

+5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-0.52%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-9.76%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.87%

-0.38%

Volatility

SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0C.DEAMES.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

4.59%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

13.65%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

16.43%

-3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

18.01%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

20.82%

-4.83%

SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0C.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AMES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0C.DE vs. AMES.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0C.DE nor AMES.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0C.DE and AMES.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC0C.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0C.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMES.DE.

SC0C.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600, while AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SC0C.DE and 0.25% for AMES.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0C.DE and AMES.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer