PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Retail Sector UCITS ETF (SC05.DE) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC05.DE achieves a -2.73% return, which is significantly lower than EQQB.DE's 20.54% return.


SC05.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
8.22%
YTD
-2.73%
6M
-1.05%
1Y
-0.73%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*
4.56%

EQQB.DE

1D
-0.82%
1M
9.26%
YTD
20.54%
6M
19.36%
1Y
37.75%
3Y*
24.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SC05.DE
Invesco European Retail Sector UCITS ETF
-2.73%8.95%8.15%35.71%-24.12%
EQQB.DE
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
20.54%6.93%33.67%51.27%-17.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SC05.DE and EQQB.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC05.DE
SC05.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SC05.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC05.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC05.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SC05.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC05.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQB.DE
EQQB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Retail Sector UCITS ETF (SC05.DE) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC05.DEEQQB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.42

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

3.73

-3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.11

11.10

-11.21

SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC05.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the EQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC05.DE and EQQB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC05.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

2.39

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.97

-0.66

Drawdowns

SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC05.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.51%, which is greater than EQQB.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC05.DE and EQQB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC05.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.51%

-26.59%

-24.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-10.08%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-26.59%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-0.82%

-4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-6.77%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

3.39%

+3.02%

Volatility

SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Retail Sector UCITS ETF (SC05.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE) at 4.38%. This indicates that SC05.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC05.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

4.38%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

10.99%

+4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

15.73%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.11%

19.97%

+2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

19.97%

+0.27%

SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC05.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQB.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SC05.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC05.DE nor EQQB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC05.DE and EQQB.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SC05.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC05.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQB.DE.

SC05.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while EQQB.DE is Nasdaq-100. SC05.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Retail, while EQQB.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC05.DE and 0.30% for EQQB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC05.DE and EQQB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer