PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Retail Sector UCITS ETF (SC05.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (36BB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC05.DE achieves a -2.73% return, which is significantly lower than 36BB.DE's -2.32% return.


SC05.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
8.22%
YTD
-2.73%
6M
-1.05%
1Y
-0.73%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*
4.56%

36BB.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-2.32%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SC05.DE
Invesco European Retail Sector UCITS ETF
-2.73%8.95%8.15%35.71%-33.09%12.03%11.17%9.67%
36BB.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
-2.32%-5.30%22.34%32.38%-29.45%27.78%25.24%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SC05.DE and 36BB.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.62

The correlation between SC05.DE and 36BB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC05.DE
SC05.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SC05.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC05.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC05.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SC05.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC05.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

36BB.DE
36BB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
36BB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Retail Sector UCITS ETF (SC05.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (36BB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC05.DE36BB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.06

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

0.28

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.11

0.77

-0.88

SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC05.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the 36BB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC05.DE and 36BB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC05.DE36BB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

0.26

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.23

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.43

-0.12

Drawdowns

SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC05.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.51%, which is greater than 36BB.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC05.DE and 36BB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC05.DE36BB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.51%

-35.03%

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-15.07%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-27.35%

+7.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.51%

-32.92%

-18.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-11.48%

+5.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-10.96%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

5.59%

+0.82%

Volatility

SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Retail Sector UCITS ETF (SC05.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (36BB.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that SC05.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC05.DE36BB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

4.81%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

12.73%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

16.71%

+2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.11%

19.44%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

20.85%

-0.61%

SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC05.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BB.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC05.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Dividend Comparison

SC05.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 36BB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36BB.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.91%0.89%1.01%0.99%1.43%0.77%1.30%0.28%
SC05.DE
Invesco European Retail Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SC05.DE and 36BB.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 36BB.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

36BB.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC05.DE.

SC05.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Retail, while 36BB.DE tracks MSCI World Consumer Discretionary. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC05.DE and 0.18% for 36BB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC05.DE and 36BB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer