SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L
SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from Invesco and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SBUY.L returned 10.96%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for JPLG.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SBUY.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPLG.L.
Performance
SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBUY.L achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.
SBUY.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
JPLG.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 22.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 6.48% | 21.60% | 14.64% | 9.46% | -0.90% | 21.36% | 8.43% | 1.80% |
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.77% | 10.11% | 12.09% | 7.05% | 0.72% | 24.67% | 2.57% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBUY.L and JPLG.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SBUY.L and JPLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Energy
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Cyclical
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Industrials
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Technology
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Healthcare
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Communication Services
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Utilities
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Defensive
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Basic Materials
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Real Estate
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SBUY.L
JPLG.L
SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBUY.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.52 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 4.09 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.93 | 15.27 | +1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBUY.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.90 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.95 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.69 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBUY.L drawdown since its inception was -30.91%, which is greater than JPLG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUY.L and JPLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBUY.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.91% | -27.53% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.79% | -5.59% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -13.65% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.76% | -13.65% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -3.30% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 1.50% | -0.01% |
Volatility
SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.96%. This indicates that SBUY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBUY.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 1.96% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.04% | 5.88% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.81% | 7.87% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 10.90% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 13.75% | +1.76% |
SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBUY.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBUY.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison
SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while JPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 1.69% | 1.86% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.91% | 1.20% | 1.62% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBUY.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SBUY.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.
Find the right allocation for SBUY.L and JPLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer