PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBUX vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBUX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBUX achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SBUX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 7.87%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.14% annualized return.


SBUX

1D
1.22%
1M
-9.95%
YTD
14.55%
6M
13.33%
1Y
12.43%
3Y*
1.50%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*
7.87%

NVDA

1D
-6.20%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.58%
1Y
46.72%
3Y*
74.54%
5Y*
63.58%
10Y*
68.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBUX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
14.55%-5.26%-2.48%-1.19%-13.18%11.15%24.19%39.09%14.74%5.36%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.11%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SBUX and NVDA is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 1999

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between SBUX and NVDA has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBUX:

$108.94B

NVDA:

$5.00T

EPS

SBUX:

$1.31

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

SBUX:

72.73

NVDA:

31.43

PS Ratio

SBUX:

2.83

NVDA:

19.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBUX:

$38.46B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBUX:

$12.24B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

SBUX:

$5.14B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBUX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBUX
SBUX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBUX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBUXNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

2.32

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

5.67

-4.17

SBUX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBUX and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBUXNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.35

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

1.23

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

1.37

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.62

-0.12

Drawdowns

SBUX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBUX drawdown since its inception was -81.91%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBUX and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBUXNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.91%

-89.72%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.53%

-20.21%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.97%

-36.88%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.68%

-66.34%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.68%

-66.34%

+22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.06%

-12.90%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-36.20%

+19.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.32%

8.27%

+0.05%

Volatility

SBUX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is 5.54%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that SBUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBUXNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

13.15%

-7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.02%

26.39%

-5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.64%

34.76%

-6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.61%

51.73%

-20.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.44%

49.84%

-20.40%

Dividends

SBUX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

SBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
2.59%2.91%2.54%2.25%2.02%1.57%1.57%1.69%2.05%1.83%1.53%1.13%

Financials

SBUX vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Starbucks Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
9.53B
81.62B
(SBUX) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SBUX vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Starbucks Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
66.3%
74.9%
Portfolio components
SBUX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.32B and revenue of 9.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.3%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

SBUX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported an operating income of 828.10M and revenue of 9.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

SBUX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a net income of 510.90M and revenue of 9.53B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SBUX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to SBUX (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBUX dropped -81.91% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBUX and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer