SBU vs. NRGU
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).
SBU and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SBU is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Nov 14, 2025. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019.
Performance
SBU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 10.52% | -0.84% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 139.49% | -9.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBU achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.
SBU
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -14.45%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRGU
- 1D
- -10.75%
- 1M
- 24.81%
- YTD
- 139.49%
- 6M
- 107.68%
- 1Y
- 69.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
SBU
NRGU
SBU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBU | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBU and NRGU is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
SBU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBU nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SBU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBU drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBU and NRGU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBU | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -57.50% | +29.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.86% | -17.40% | -4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -25.38% | +19.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.12% | — |
Volatility
SBU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBU | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.05% | 88.18% | -27.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.05% | 87.12% | -26.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.05% | 87.12% | -26.07% |