PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBT.TO achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than XGD.TO's 3.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SBT.TO has underperformed XGD.TO with an annualized return of 13.84%, while XGD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.79% annualized return.


SBT.TO

1D
-2.53%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.24%
6M
24.07%
1Y
105.34%
3Y*
42.09%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
13.84%

XGD.TO

1D
-2.80%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.35%
6M
8.72%
1Y
67.78%
3Y*
43.11%
5Y*
22.30%
10Y*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBT.TO
Purpose Silver Bullion Fund
2.24%137.07%18.55%-0.86%1.99%-13.18%48.01%13.31%-12.82%-17.07%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
3.35%144.45%19.63%3.91%-3.10%-5.81%21.10%40.18%-4.10%0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SBT.TO and XGD.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2016

0.29

Over the past year, SBT.TO and XGD.TO have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBT.TO
SBT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBT.TOXGD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.35

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

6.22

-0.89

SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBT.TO and XGD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBT.TOXGD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.59

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.69

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.45

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.25

-0.04

Drawdowns

SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBT.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.82%, smaller than the maximum XGD.TO drawdown of -72.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBT.TO and XGD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBT.TOXGD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.82%

-72.55%

+24.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.69%

-28.95%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.69%

-28.95%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.69%

-40.82%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.82%

-46.96%

-0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.47%

-23.49%

-13.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-28.30%

+11.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.84%

10.93%

+8.91%

Volatility

SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.19% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) at 14.43%. This indicates that SBT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBT.TOXGD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.19%

14.43%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.92%

34.40%

+23.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.01%

42.86%

+16.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.64%

32.64%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.58%

33.38%

+33.20%

SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBT.TO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than XGD.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBT.TO vs. XGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

SBT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBT.TO
Purpose Silver Bullion Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
0.60%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.80%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.09%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBT.TO and XGD.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBT.TO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBT.TO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XGD.TO.

SBT.TO is categorized as Silver, while XGD.TO is Precious Metals. SBT.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XGD.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SBT.TO and 0.61% for XGD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBT.TO and XGD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer