PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBT.TO vs. REGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBT.TO vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SBT.TO is traded in CAD, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBT.TO achieves a -18.66% return, which is significantly lower than REGB.L's 19.12% return.


SBT.TO

1D
2.14%
1M
-22.62%
YTD
-18.66%
6M
-23.97%
1Y
57.19%
3Y*
34.43%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
11.27%

REGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.83%
YTD
19.12%
6M
17.88%
1Y
118.40%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBT.TO vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SBT.TO
Purpose Silver Bullion Fund
-18.66%137.07%18.55%-0.86%1.99%1.70%
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
19.12%80.30%-30.19%-20.64%-26.77%-20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SBT.TO and REGB.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.22

The correlation between SBT.TO and REGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBT.TO vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBT.TO
SBT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

REGB.L
REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBT.TO vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBT.TOREGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

5.69

-4.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

13.21

-10.76

SBT.TO vs. REGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the REGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBT.TO and REGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBT.TO vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBT.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, smaller than the maximum REGB.L drawdown of -72.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBT.TO and REGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBT.TOREGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-72.82%

+20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.39%

-20.93%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.39%

-58.28%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.25%

-30.80%

-19.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-45.32%

+28.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.42%

9.00%

+14.42%

Volatility

SBT.TO vs. REGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.91% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) at 13.89%. This indicates that SBT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBT.TOREGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.91%

13.89%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.53%

34.41%

+25.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.18%

46.93%

+14.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.75%

48.04%

-10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.39%

48.04%

+19.35%

SBT.TO vs. REGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBT.TO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than REGB.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBT.TO vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBT.TO nor REGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SBT.TO and REGB.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBT.TO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBT.TO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REGB.L.

SBT.TO is categorized as Silver, while REGB.L is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. SBT.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price, while REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SBT.TO and 0.59% for REGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBT.TO and REGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer