PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SBT.TO is traded in CAD, while PSU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SBT.TO having a 2.24% return and PSU-U.TO slightly higher at 2.34%.


SBT.TO

1D
-2.53%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.24%
6M
24.07%
1Y
105.34%
3Y*
42.09%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
13.84%

PSU-U.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
2.22%
YTD
2.34%
6M
0.82%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SBT.TO
Purpose Silver Bullion Fund
2.24%137.07%18.55%-0.86%1.99%-13.18%48.01%13.31%-12.82%
PSU-U.TO
Purpose US Cash Fund
2.34%-1.75%12.58%1.64%8.73%-0.62%-1.27%-3.31%7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SBT.TO and PSU-U.TO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2018

-0.16

The correlation between SBT.TO and PSU-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBT.TO
SBT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PSU-U.TO
PSU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PSU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBT.TOPSU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.16

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.00

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

2.59

+2.74

SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the PSU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBT.TO and PSU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBT.TOPSU-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.89

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.89

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.46

-0.25

Drawdowns

SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBT.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.82%, which is greater than PSU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBT.TO and PSU-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBT.TOPSU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.82%

-16.93%

-30.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.69%

-4.07%

-38.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.69%

-5.47%

-37.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.69%

-5.47%

-37.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.47%

-0.70%

-36.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-4.87%

-12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.84%

1.57%

+18.27%

Volatility

SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.19% compared to Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO) at 0.83%. This indicates that SBT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBT.TOPSU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.19%

0.83%

+16.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.92%

3.44%

+54.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.01%

4.59%

+54.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.64%

6.32%

+30.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.58%

6.56%

+60.02%

SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBT.TO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than PSU-U.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBT.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

SBT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PSU-U.TO
Purpose US Cash Fund
2.70%2.90%3.65%3.87%1.45%0.29%0.41%1.70%1.20%
SBT.TO
Purpose Silver Bullion Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBT.TO and PSU-U.TO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SBT.TO.

SBT.TO is categorized as Silver, while PSU-U.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SBT.TO and 0.17% for PSU-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBT.TO and PSU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer