PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBT.TO achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than BTCC-B.TO's -24.57% return.


SBT.TO

1D
-2.53%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.24%
6M
24.07%
1Y
105.34%
3Y*
42.09%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
13.84%

BTCC-B.TO

1D
-2.32%
1M
-16.56%
YTD
-24.57%
6M
-30.34%
1Y
-38.41%
3Y*
33.56%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SBT.TO
Purpose Silver Bullion Fund
2.24%137.07%18.55%-0.86%1.99%-15.97%
BTCC-B.TO
Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units
-24.57%-11.83%136.57%148.15%-62.24%-14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SBT.TO and BTCC-B.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2021

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBT.TO
SBT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCC-B.TO
BTCC-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBT.TOBTCC-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.86

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

-0.76

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

-1.32

+6.65

SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBT.TO and BTCC-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBT.TOBTCC-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

-0.91

+2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.26

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.08

+0.13

Drawdowns

SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBT.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.82%, smaller than the maximum BTCC-B.TO drawdown of -75.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBT.TO and BTCC-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBT.TOBTCC-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.82%

-75.12%

+27.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.69%

-50.47%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.69%

-50.47%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.69%

-75.12%

+32.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.47%

-48.47%

+11.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-32.80%

+15.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.84%

29.15%

-9.31%

Volatility

SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.19% compared to Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) at 9.66%. This indicates that SBT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCC-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBT.TOBTCC-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.19%

9.66%

+7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.92%

33.59%

+24.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.01%

42.49%

+16.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.64%

53.77%

-17.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.58%

54.95%

+11.63%

SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBT.TO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCC-B.TO's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBT.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBT.TO nor BTCC-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SBT.TO and BTCC-B.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBT.TO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBT.TO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO.

SBT.TO is categorized as Silver, while BTCC-B.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SBT.TO and 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBT.TO and BTCC-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer