PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBR vs. VIRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBR vs. VIRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBR achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than VIRT's 81.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SBR has underperformed VIRT with an annualized return of 16.34%, while VIRT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.


SBR

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.51%
6M
11.20%
YTD
11.57%
1Y
19.45%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
24.15%
10Y*
16.34%
ALL TIME*
15.38%

VIRT

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.15%
6M
62.47%
YTD
81.20%
1Y
38.30%
3Y*
52.81%
5Y*
23.17%
10Y*
18.05%
ALL TIME*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.30M$2.17M$2.74M
$75.83M$74.91M$74.80M

SBR vs. VIRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBR
Sabine Royalty Trust
11.57%14.04%4.06%-13.10%132.08%60.71%-24.24%15.77%-9.61%34.83%
VIRT
Virtu Financial, Inc.
81.20%-4.24%83.03%4.61%-26.51%18.58%64.42%-34.86%45.96%21.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SBR and VIRT is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBR:

$1.08B

VIRT:

$12.89B

EPS

SBR:

$5.69

VIRT:

$13.54

PE Ratio

SBR:

12.97

VIRT:

4.41

PEG Ratio

SBR:

0.78

VIRT:

0.17

PS Ratio

SBR:

12.44

VIRT:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBR:

$57.67M

VIRT:

$3.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBR:

$58.05M

VIRT:

$1.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

SBR:

$55.09M

VIRT:

$2.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBR vs. VIRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBR
SBR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VIRT
VIRT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VIRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VIRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIRT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBR vs. VIRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBRVIRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.46

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

2.68

-0.59

SBR vs. VIRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the VIRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBR and VIRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBR vs. VIRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBR drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, roughly equal to the maximum VIRT drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBR and VIRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBRVIRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.40%

-56.17%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.54%

-27.30%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-27.83%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.56%

-54.52%

+19.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.71%

-56.17%

+5.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-10.60%

+4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.61%

-25.46%

+11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.05%

14.83%

-5.78%

Volatility

SBR vs. VIRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) is 3.95%, while Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that SBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBRVIRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

14.15%

-10.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

27.24%

-11.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.41%

32.11%

-7.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.69%

32.78%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.21%

36.06%

-4.85%

Dividends

SBR vs. VIRT - Dividend Comparison

SBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than VIRT's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBR
Sabine Royalty Trust
6.64%7.53%8.41%9.41%10.13%7.72%8.59%7.49%8.98%5.31%5.50%11.82%
VIRT
Virtu Financial, Inc.
1.61%2.88%2.69%4.74%4.70%3.33%3.81%6.00%3.73%5.25%6.02%2.12%

Financials

SBR vs. VIRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sabine Royalty Trust and Virtu Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SBR and VIRT have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIRT has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to SBR (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBR dropped -56.40% vs VIRT's -56.17%.

VIRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBR and VIRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer